Sylvain Delcomminette (2018) Aristote et la nécessité, Vrin. 1ère partie. L'idéalisme langagier d'Aristote. (introduction). 21-24. ch.1. Statut et fonction de l'analyse du langage. 25-40.
Sylvain Delcomminette (2018) Aristote et la nécessité, Vrin. Introduction. 11-19.
Joseph Owens (1978) The Doctrine of Being in the Aristotelian Metaphysics, 3rd ed., Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies. Part One. The approach to the Aristotelian treatment of being. Chap.1. The problem of being in the Metaphysics. …
Pierre Aubenque [1962] (2013) Le problème de l'être chez Aristote: Essai sur la problématique aristotélicienne. Presses Universitaires de France. Introduction. La science sans nom. Chapitre II. Philosophie première ou métaphysique ? 45-68.…
Pierre Aubenque [1962] (2013) Le problème de l'être chez Aristote: Essai sur la problématique aristotélicienne. Presses Universitaires de France. Introduction. La science sans nom. Chapitre I. Μετὰ τὰ φυσικά. 21-44.
G. E. R. Lloyd (1966) Polarity and Analogy: Two Types of Argumentation in Early Greek Thought, Cambridge University Press. Part One: Polarity. Chapter 2. The analysis of different modes of opposition. 86-171. 内容に鑑みて 'opposition' の訳…
A. John Simmons (1979) Moral Principles and Political Obligations, Princeton University Press. Chap.3. The Consent Tradition. 57-74.
A. John Simmons (1979) Moral Principles and Political Obligations, Princeton University Press. Chap.2. The problem of political obligation. 29-56.
A. John Simmons (1979) Moral Principles and Political Obligations, Princeton University Press. Introduction. 3-6. Chap.1. Obligations. 7-28.
G. E. R. Lloyd (1966) Polarity and Analogy: Two Types of Argumentation in Early Greek Thought, Cambridge University Press. Part One: Polarity. Chapter 1. Theories based on opposites in early Greek thought. 15-85.
Orna Harari (2011) "The Unity of Aristotle's Category of Relatives" The Classical Quarterly 61(2), 521-537.
Fabio Morales (1994) "Relational Attributes in Aristotle" Phronesis 39(3), 255-274.
Damien Janos (2021) "Avicenna on Equivocity and Modulation: A Reconsideration of the asmāʾ mushakkika (and tashkīk al-wujūd)" Oriens 49, 1-62. [here 22-62.]
Mario Mignucci [1988] (2021) "Relatives in Plato" in Ancient Logic, Language, and Metaphysics, 279-299. Andrea Falcon による英訳.原論文は "Platone e i relativi" (1988) Elenchos 9, 259-284.
Talia Bettcher (2014) "Feminist Perspectives on Trans Issues" The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2014 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), 47-77. 8節から終わりまで.「トランスジェンダーとフェミニズム」という見出しを付けてきたが,…
Damien Janos (2021) "Avicenna on Equivocity and Modulation: A Reconsideration of the asmāʾ mushakkika (and tashkīk al-wujūd)" Oriens 49, 1-62. [here 1-22.] アリストテレスの ὁμώνυμα と πρὸς ἓν λεγόμενα の関係如何に相当する問題がアヴィセンナ…
1月分.
David Sedley (2002) "Aristotelian Relatives" in Monique Canto-Sperber et Pierre Pellegrin (éd.) Le style de la pensée, Les Belles Lettres, 324-352. Cat. の関係項の第二定義は,第一定義から「ソフトな」関係項を除外し,「ハードな」(当の関係項…
Talia Bettcher (2014) "Feminist Perspectives on Trans Issues" The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2014 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), 22-47. 前回 (§1-4) の続き.バトラーの出てくる5節が異様に難解.批評が取り上げられている Pari…
Jason Stanley and Timothy Williamson (2001) "Knowing How" The Journal of Philosophy 98 (8), 411-444. knowledge-how と knowledge-that の Ryle 的な区別の批判."x knows how to F" は言語学の標準的意味論で解釈すればふつうの knowledge-that の帰…
Janet Levin (1986) "Could Love be Like a Heatwave? Physicalism and the Subjective Character of Experience" Philosophical Studies 49, 245-261.
12月分.
William G. Lycan (2010) "What, exactly, is a paradox?" Analysis 70(4), 615-622. Quine (1966) 批判.正直先行研究の文脈を追わないと何がどう新しい論点なのかよく分からない.
Gareth Evans (1978) "Can There be Vague Objects?" Analysis 38(4), 208. David Lewis (1988) "Vague Identity: Evans Misunderstood" Analysis 48(3), 128-130. Evans が簡潔に書きすぎて Lewis が注釈をしている.Lewis 論文の手つきはほぼ哲学史 (最後…
Nuel D. Belnap (1962) "Tonk, Plonk and Plink" Analysis 22(6), 130-134.
A. N. Prior (1960) "The Runabout Inference-Ticket" Analysis 21(2), 38-39.
Mario Mignucci (1986) "Aristotle's Definitions of Relatives in Cat. 7" Phronesis 31(2), 101-127.
Sarah Sawyer (2018) "Is there a deductive argument for semantic externalism? Reply to Yli-Vakkuri" Analysis 78(4), 675-681. これで概ね納得した.
Jonathan Brink Morgan (forthcoming) "Content externalism without thought experiments?" Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anab060 Yli-Vakkuri 2018 を読んで何がどうなってるのか分からないという感想を抱いたが,これを読んでなおさら分から…
Juhani Yli-Vakkuri (2018) "Semantic Externalism without thought experiments" Analysis 78(1), 81-90. 著者は Narrow Content の共著者.着想の核心は §3 に示されている.